Location: Home > NEWS > Detail

Russian Collection Societies Consolidate to Ease Royalty Process Russia’s three accredited collecting societies that deal with author and neighboring rights, have announced they are merging in a move that is set to simplify procedures for royalty collection. The new organization is to be called the culture professionals' union "Russia's Author Society."

%e5%b1%8f%e5%b9%95%e5%bf%ab%e7%85%a7-2016-12-26-15-32-43
admin 2015-07-25 Collect Review (123)

Russia’s three accredited collecting societies that deal with author and neighboring rights, have announced they are merging in a move that is set to simplify procedures for royalty collection. The new organization is to be called the culture professionals’ union “Russia’s Author Society.”

A spokesperson for RAO (Russia’s Author Society) tells Billboard that the new organization will be the successor to RAO, the state-approved authors’ rights collecting society, VOIS, which deals with neighboring rights, and RSP, which collects a one-percent tax on imports of electronic devices that can be used for copying content.

“Succession will be observed as far as responsibilities before rights holders and relations with licensees and users are concerned, and there will be no interruption of regular royalty collection operations,” she said. “Distribution and paying out of royalties to rights holders will be done on time and in strict compliance with the law.”

The merger is apparently going to make procedures easier for rights holders as they will no longer have separate agreements for author rights and performing rights royalties and will now deal with one collecting society rather than several. Similarly, rights holders registered with the new organizations will automatically collect their share of the copying equipment task.

In Russia, only state-approved collecting societies can legitimately operate. The appointment of VOIS as the country’s sole collecting society for neighboring rights raised controversy back in 2009, and two other contenders, RFA and ROUPI, tried to question the decision in court, but the case went nowhere.

Review ( 1Article ) Log In

必填

必填,绝不公开

  1. Janaye : 回复

    Greetings! I know this really is kinda off topic but I was wondering which weblog platform are you using for this web site? I’m obtaining sick and tired of WordPress because I⢃ªve had issues with hackers and I’m looking at options for an additional platform. I would be fantastic should you could point me within the direction of a good platform.

Related

Share Article
Review
  • Who will invest in NetEase Cloud Music?
    Mashape Market:I have read this post about 4
  • A Chinese Classical Music Library is Earning Money
    tranquilhairsty8.snack.ws:Thanks for the good writeup. I
  • A lot of challenges facing festivals in China
    董 露茜:Dear, Good Luck!!!
  • The future of live music is promising
    董 露茜:Thank you so much and have a g
  • Jason Dottley's Music Video to Break Record
    Kaley:Gudugudu so-called, mark you,t
  • 1 dead, 20 hurt after tent collapses at Chicago festival
    Idalee:Good post. I study one thing m
  • Adele announces first tour in four years
    Jacki:Bon, bein je crois que l'
  • Russian Collection Societies Consolidate to Ease Royalty Process
    Janaye:Greetings! I know this really
  • Lizhi FM off shelf on Apple Store----Loom Wars in China’s audio market
    Lurraine:Great goals! Yes, dance (espec
  • SoundCloud sued for copyright infringement by PRS for music
    Lotta:Most excellent tip. Those dot
  • Copyright © 2015 China Music Business News

    京ICP备14034174号-6

    Have An Account, Login Now