Location: Home > NEWS > Detail

SESAC Settles Antitrust Suit Brought By Commercial Radio Group In settling the lawsuit, SESAC is agreeing to most of the actions that the RMLC was seeking in its suit for injunctive relief.

%e5%b1%8f%e5%b9%95%e5%bf%ab%e7%85%a7-2016-12-26-15-31-25
admin 2015-07-25 Collect Review (240)

John Josephson, chairman and CEO of SESAC.

Courtesy SESAC

Performing rights organization SESAC has settled the antitrust litigation brought against it by the Radio Music Licensing Committee, the commercial radio industry group which alleged that the PRO violated provisions (specifically, sections one and two) of the Sherman Act and of the Clayton Act (section 16).

In settling the lawsuit, SESAC is agreeing to most of the actions that the RMLC was seeking in its suit for injunctive relief. In the Federal court filing with the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the RMLC wanted SESAC to negotiate with the radio organization, instead of forcing individual radio stations to cut separate deals with the PRO; to submit to a judicial rate-setting procedure; to provide better transparency on what songs are in the SESAC catalog; and called for per-program and adjustable rate licenses which would make direct licenses with songwriters more feasible.

The RMLC said it was seeking injunctive relief, not monitory damages, though it did seek reimbursement for legal fees.

As part of the settlement, SESAC is paying $3.5 million to cover RMLC’s legal costs and has agreed that if the two parties couldn’t come to a deal on rates then, beginning in 2016, an arbitration process would be enacted. Moreover, that arbitration process would exist for the next 22 years, through 2037, and past rates paid to SESAC will not be considered precedential.

In addition, SESAC will continue to offer its existing all-talk amendment discount of 75 percent; SESAC will refrain from pursuing pending audit claims or instigating new audits; and it will enhance its online repertoire search offerings. Moreover, the settlement will give SESAC writers and publishers greater ability to license works directly to radio station operators.

“With this settlement, we’ve secured commercial arbitration for the next 22 years as the basis for setting SESAC’s license fees for commercial radio stations represented by the RMLC,” SESAC chairman and CEO John Josephson said in a statement. “This guarantees a level playing field in establishing the fair market value of our creators’ musical works for the broadcast radio industry… We are confident in our ability to achieve a positive outcome for our affiliated composers and music publishers in radio based on our historical arbitration experience in the local television market with the Television Music License Committee.”

While the RMLC was seeking a rate-setting process and was rewarded with arbitration, this is not the first time that arbitration has been discussed by SESAC and the RMLC. Twice before, between 2008-2010, SESAC raised the possibility of using arbitration, but was rebuffed by the RMLC, which was engaged in negotiations with ASCAP and BMI at the time and looked to wait two years, according to a SESAC spokeswoman.

“Litigation is always a last resort, but the RMLC felt compelled to file this lawsuit in order to impose some rate setting parameters upon SESAC that would mirror the antitrust consent decree process that has been in place with ASCAP and BMI for decades and that has achieved equitable license fees for the industry, RMLC Chairman Ed Christian said in a statement.

SESAC, through its spokeswoman, says it engages in rate arbitration with the Television Music Licensing Committee and was pleased with the outcome of its last two arbitration proceedings with that group, adding that the organization welcomes the opportunity to utilize the same mechanism to set rates for the radio industry in the event the parties aren’t able to reach agreement through negotiation.

The RMLC was represented in the lawsuit by the Washington, DC firm of Latham & Watkins while the settlement was handled by the New York City firm of Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP.

Review ( 暂无留言 ) Log In

必填

必填,绝不公开

Related

Share Article
Review
  • Who will invest in NetEase Cloud Music?
    Mashape Market:I have read this post about 4
  • A Chinese Classical Music Library is Earning Money
    tranquilhairsty8.snack.ws:Thanks for the good writeup. I
  • A lot of challenges facing festivals in China
    董 露茜:Dear, Good Luck!!!
  • The future of live music is promising
    董 露茜:Thank you so much and have a g
  • Jason Dottley's Music Video to Break Record
    Kaley:Gudugudu so-called, mark you,t
  • 1 dead, 20 hurt after tent collapses at Chicago festival
    Idalee:Good post. I study one thing m
  • Adele announces first tour in four years
    Jacki:Bon, bein je crois que l'
  • Russian Collection Societies Consolidate to Ease Royalty Process
    Janaye:Greetings! I know this really
  • Lizhi FM off shelf on Apple Store----Loom Wars in China’s audio market
    Lurraine:Great goals! Yes, dance (espec
  • SoundCloud sued for copyright infringement by PRS for music
    Lotta:Most excellent tip. Those dot
  • Copyright © 2015 China Music Business News

    京ICP备14034174号-6

    Have An Account, Login Now